ESG = BS…GND (Green New Deal)
| About the Author—Professor Ellis Washington, J.D.—I went to Harvard Law School for 1 year (1988-89) with future POTUS Barack Hussein Obama, (b. 1960 – d. 09/29/2019), but I took the opposite path in Life—New World Order, Communism, Treason, Pedophilia, Abortion and Satanic Ritual Abuse vs. Christianity, Conservatism, Protecting the Children, Protecting Life and TRUMPism. I repeatedly refused to take the “Satan OATH” for Careerism and Celebrity which is why I’ve been blacklisted since 1989 – for over 34 years—for my entire legal and academic career, yet I Fight on! Why? To avenge Harvard University’s original 1692 motto—Veritas pro Christo et Ecclesia {= Truth for Christ and the Church}.
To escape the 150-year Rothschild Chattel Slavery systems (e.g., Birth certificates, Death certificates, Social Security numbers bought, sold and trading people’s identities like animals on Wall Street) and Rothschild Debt Slavery systems (e.g., IRS, Income Taxes, Death Taxes, Fiat/Counterfeit currency not based on Gold or Silver, but based on NOTHING!—national currencies of the world promiscuously printed at will by the Rothschild Central Bankers to fund perpetual False Flag Wars) while keeping the entire world enslaved inside the Birth-School-Labor-Taxes-Debts-Retirement-Death cycle of the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia Matrix (1871-2021), then read and share the Truth of my Critical Thinking blog that has recently exceeded 22 million views @ EllisWashingtonReport.com and on @Facebook, @Twitter— #JesusIsLord #DCActof1871 |
I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen. Not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else. ~ C.S. Lewis
The simple step of a courageous individual is not to partake in the [Big] Lie. One word of truth outweighs the whole world. ~ Alexander Solzhenitsyn
“ESG is the greatest attack on capitalism, it’s the manifestation of stakeholder capitalism that is in the ecosystem today.”
~ Rep. Andrew Barr (R-KY)
The Republican group seeks to craft “a policy agenda designed to protect the financial interest of everyday investors from progressive activists who are using our institutions to force far-left ideology on Americans.”
~ Republican Working Group on ESG Policy
You have been lied to all of your life. History has been a [Big] Lie created by the [Rothschild Khazarian] Cabal for thousands of years for Control.
A. Prologue to using Aristotle’s “First Principles” as a Thesis Exposing the Hoax History we’ve all been taught for Generations under U.S.A., INC. and giving you a Synopsis of the Real History of the United States for America—a REPUBLIC
One of the most important things I’ve learned from reading the writings of the great Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 B.C.) is this—In order to properly, systematically and comprehensively understand and study any given subject, discipline or area of inquiry is to always begin from First Principles. For example, in this essay I am writing a review based on an interesting article written by my son, Stone Washington, published with the Libertarian think tank, Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) titled – Republican Working Group issues first critical report against ESG. Stone’s article addresses the recent policy debates between the Democrat Socialist Party and the Republican Party whereby the Democrats under the Resident Biden administration are aggressively trying to enslave every business in America with subjective and unverifiable ESG (Environmental Social Governance) policies as a form of Green New Deal 2.0. A comprehensive ESG policy would effectively turn America from a Republic into a Socialist Slave society overnight.
In so doing my analysis is not based on the illegitimate laws of the so-called country called THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. (a Rothschild Khazarian Mafia corporation), but on what President Trump returned America back to its original origins of the Constitutional Framers on January 20, 2021 based on the Politics and Philosophy, Public Policy and History of the United States for America (a REPUBLIC).
In doing this analysis based on Aristotle’s First Principles by necessity I am exposing the imposter corporation country secretly established by the Rothschild family known as the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. whose stolen History of Humanity has allowed a very small Cabal of super rich, narcissistic, psychopaths belonging to various Satanic cults called among other names—Rothschild Khazarian Mafia, the Illuminati, Freemasons, Rosicrucians, Skull and Bones, and other secret societies along with their allied institutions including—Council of 13, Committee of 300, Octagon Group, Trilateral Commission, World Economic Forum, United Nations, International Monetary Fund, Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers, DAVOS, and other Globalist, elitist entities connected to the Satanic New World Order.
From the Shadows for 150 years (1871-2021) the Rothschild Central Bankers in particularly have been using their trillions to effectively enslave hundreds of millions of people in America, including billions and billions of people worldwide under the treacherous legislation called the District of Columbia Act of 1871. In England this law was called the 1871 Act of England and a version of this evil, Machiavellian legislation that has enslaved America and the world for 150 years exits in virtually every United Nations member state country in the world in the perpetual bondage of Chattel Slavery and Debt Slavery TO THIS DAY! *N.B.: For further research and reading see my comprehensive 5-part essay series on the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia (aka Central Bankers).
Therefore, using Aristotle’s First Principles let us propose a Thesis #1—To Understand History always carefully examine and study the Politics and Philosophy, History and Warmongerings of the 13 Illuminati Royal Family Bloodlines. Why? Because following this technique will assist us in better understanding the power behind the Shadows who manipulate Reality through the Ages vs. Understanding the God of the Bible who controls the Reality of Truth through the Ages —
“First principles thinking consists of deriving things to their fundamental proven axioms in the given arena, before reasoning up by asking which ones are relevant to the question at hand, then cross referencing conclusions based on chosen axioms and making sure conclusions don’t violate any fundamental laws.”
Thus, I will begin this essay with a quote by Morpheus to his protégée Neo in the 1999 movie, The Matrix—”Everything they told you was a [Big] Lie”. This statement is a variation of the meme I used before by the great Spanish-American Philosopher, Historian, Essayist, Poet, Novelist – George Santayana (1863-1952)—“History is a pack of lies told by people who weren’t there. . . . History is always written wrong, and so always needs to be rewritten.”
*N.B.: The word Government actually means mind control. It etymologically originated from the ancient Latin language. It divides into two words:1) (guvernare) meaning “to control” and 2) (mens or mentis) meaning “mind”.
Source: Medium.com
B. Is ESG a BS. . .GND (Green New Deal 2.0)?
My son, Stone Washington, is a Research Fellow at the libertarian Think Tank, Competitive Enterprise Institute. On July 14 he published a fascinating article published on the CEI website titled – Republican Working Group issues first critical report against ESG. I’m not sure if it is out of interest or necessity but Stone is steadily, consistently over the past year demonstrating a critical analysis and acumen of ESG policy and my son surely is intellectually ascending the ladder to become a bona fide expert on Environmental, Social, Governance or ESG policy.
Before I get into the analysis of Stone’s article, allow me to give a brief historical background about how the political Left and the Democrat Socialist Party in America over the past 225 years has tried one policy after another literally almost every decade to try to usurp the Natural Rights of We the People to the dictates of Socialism Slavery but to no avail. In other words ESG is just the latest iteration by the Democrat Socialist Party to do two things: (1) Steal the Natural Rights of We the People through the false paradigm of Climate Change pseudo-science; (2) Once we accept the Big Lie of Climate Change which include the Globalist and Environmentalist trope that there are too many people on the planet producing too much carbon dioxide (the stuff humans breath out when they exhale of which plants and trees need to live in exchange for the oxygen they give us) and that 90% of the world’s population must die, then businesses must meet certain bureaucratic measurements to affirm that said company is ESG compliant.
Of course, since the metrics are subjective rather than objective no company (no matter how compliant) with the government Gestapo Green New Deal rules will ever 100% accede to be compliant in the government eyes. Why? Because any ESG policy objectives will of necessity be based on subjective rather than based on objective criteria which can stand up to scientific verification, quality, testability, hypothesis, observation, experimentation, and theory. ESG policy admittedly has none of these basic precepts of science. Why? Because ESG policy isn’t science, it’s just partisan Leftist politics of Socialism Slavery all dressed up to have the appearance that ESG is really the failed Green New Deal 2.0.
If you don’t believe that current ESG policy is just a different shade of lipstick on that same filthy pig the Democrats trot out to the public every 10 years or so, then look at this list below of environmental policies since the late 1790s! and note that the years each “policy” was active—
C. Synopsis and Review of Environmental and Population Control Policies (1790s – present)
Malthusianism (1798-1960s)
Malthusianism is the theory that population growth is potentially exponential, according to the Malthusian growth model, while the growth of the food supply or other resources is linear, which eventually reduces living standards to the point of triggering a population decline. This event, called a Malthusian catastrophe[1] (also known as a Malthusian trap, population trap, Malthusian check, Malthusian crisis, Malthusian spectre, or Malthusian crunch) occurs when population growth outpaces agricultural production, causing famine or war, resulting in poverty and depopulation. Such a catastrophe inevitably has the effect of forcing the population to “correct” back to a lower, more easily sustainable level (quite rapidly, due to the potential severity and unpredictable results of the mitigating factors involved, as compared to the relatively slow time scales and well-understood processes governing unchecked growth or growth affected by preventive checks).
*N.B.: The year 1798, the year Malthusianism (using “science” as a predicate for radical world population reduction due to low food yields) originated with English cleric and economist, Robert Thomas Malthus (1766-1834), and the publication of his famous 1798 book which was very close to the same year that mass vaccination (e.g., “population control”) was started in England by Dr. Edward Jenner (1796) and quickly expanded throughout the world beginning in 1798—
The book An Essay on the Principle of Population was first published anonymously in 1798,[1] but the author was soon identified as Thomas Robert Malthus. The book warned of future difficulties, on an interpretation of the population increasing in geometric progression (so as to double every 25 years)[2] while food production increased in an arithmetic progression, which would leave a difference resulting in the want of food and famine, unless birth rates decreased.[2]
Global Cooling (early 1970s – 2012)
Global cooling was a conjecture, especially during the 1970s, of imminent cooling of the Earth culminating in a period of extensive glaciation, due to the cooling effects of aerosols or orbital forcing. Some press reports in the 1970s speculated about continued cooling; these did not accurately reflect the scientific literature of the time, which was generally more concerned with warming from an enhanced greenhouse effect.[1]
In the mid-1970s, the limited temperature series available suggested that the temperature had decreased for several decades up to then. As longer time series of higher quality became available, it became clear that global temperature showed significant increases overall.
*N.B.: Because the Political Left and their Gestapo wing, the Democrat Socialist Party has exerted over the past 200 years slavish control over culture and society, neither the Republican Party, the propaganda media, academics, theologians, scientists, intellectuals (which they all control the institutions they are affiliated with) have neither the ability or inclination to expose for example how the Globalists in the 1970s heralded “The Coming Ice Age” only to retract that comprehensive fearmongering 30 years later with a cover page BY THE SAME MAGAZINE [Newsweek] heralding Global Warming and virtually no one with a voice pointed out this blatant example of Mass Mind Control.
Global Warming (2012 – present)
The global warming controversy concerns the public debate over whether global warming is occurring, how much has occurred in modern times, what has caused it, what its effects will be, whether any action can or should be taken to curb it, and if so what that action should be. In the scientific literature, there is a very strong consensus that global surface temperatures have increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases.[1][2][3][4][5][6] No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view,[7] though a few organizations with members in extractive industries hold non-committal positions,[8] and some have tried to persuade the public that climate change is not happening, or if the climate is changing it is not because of human influence,[9][10] attempting to sow doubt in the scientific consensus.[11]
Carbon Offsets and Credits (early 2000s – present)
A carbon offset is a reduction or removal of emissions of carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases made in order to compensate for emissions made elsewhere.[1][2][3] A carbon credit or offset credit is a transferrable financial instrument (i.e. a derivative of an underlying commodity) certified by governments or independent certification bodies to represent an emission reduction that can then be bought or sold.[4][5][6] Both offsets and credits are measured in tonnes of carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO2e). One carbon offset or credit represents the reduction or removal of one ton of carbon dioxide or its equivalent in other greenhouse gases.
Of course, many people will remember back in the early 2000s when Al Gore, the V.P. under President Bill Clinton (1993-2001) and the subsequent presidential candidate who lost the closest election in history in Nov. 2000 against George W. Bush. After his defeat Al Gore immediately went full throttle to become the face of then called – Global Warming fearmongering movement and monetized this pseudo-science policy to enrich himself to the tune of hundreds of millions of personal wealth with these two additional elements—Carbon offsets and Carbon credits that his company would sell to every company (and person) in America to make sure they are within the government’s annual energy mandates. But not to fret, if the person or company exceeded the government’s annual energy mandates that individual or company could purchase Carbon offsets in order to have the sufficient amount of Carbon credits. This would amount to billions if not trillions to Al Gore’s and the Globalist’s Carbon Credit companies while he flies around the world on his private jet and lives in several mega-mansions emitting carbon gases way above the government mandated amount. But rules are for thee and not for me.
Climate Change (late 1980s – present)
In common usage, climate change describes global warming—the ongoing increase in global average temperature—and its effects on Earth’s climate system. Climate change in a broader sense also includes previous long-term changes to Earth’s climate. The current rise in global average temperature is more rapid than previous changes, and is primarily caused by humans burning fossil fuels.[2][3] Fossil fuel use, deforestation, and some agricultural and industrial practices increase greenhouse gases, notably carbon dioxide and methane.[4] Greenhouse gases absorb some of the heat that the Earth radiates after it warms from sunlight. Larger amounts of these gases trap more heat in Earth’s lower atmosphere, causing global warming.
According to Wikipedia, “Activism related to climate change began in the late 1980s, when major environmental organizations became involved in the discussions about climate, mainly in the UNFCCC framework.” One of the factors that all of these climate change policies cited here in my summary analysis scrupulously ignore is a yellow dwarf star in our solar system called the S-U-N. Why? Because the politicians of the Democrat Socialist Party and their bought-and-paid-for pseudo scientists who are paid to produce fake science to bolster all of these climate hoaxes as a means to steal more money from the taxpayers and put it in the pockets of unscrupulous politicians and the people whose votes they covet when they all should be sent to a military tribunal at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and given swift just at the end of a rope for their rampant treason, sedition and fraud on a Hitlerian scale!
Green New Deal (2012 – present)
Green New Deal (GND) proposals call for public policy to address climate change along with achieving other social aims like job creation, economic growth and reducing economic inequality. The following are some of the common points of the many Green New Deal proposals in the United States:[1][2]
- 100% Clean Energy: The Green New Deal proposes a transition to 100% clean, renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and geothermal power within 10 years.
- Infrastructure: The plan calls for a major investment in infrastructure, including the development of a modern energy grid, the upgrading of buildings to be more energy-efficient, and the expansion of public transportation.
- Jobs and Economic Growth: The Green New Deal aims to create millions of new, high-paying jobs in sectors such as renewable energy, manufacturing, and construction, with a focus on creating jobs in communities that have been historically marginalized.
- Social Justice: The plan seeks to address economic inequality and promote social justice by ensuring that the benefits of the transition to clean energy are shared fairly among all communities, including low-income and minority communities.
- Sustainable Agriculture: The Green New Deal proposes supporting sustainable agriculture practices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve soil health.
- Investment in Research and Development: The plan calls for significant investment in research and development of new technologies that can help to address climate change.
Overall, the Green New Deal seeks to present a comprehensive, ambitious solution to what proponents see as the urgent threat of climate change while promoting economic growth and what they consider social justice.
The name refers back to the New Deal, a set of reforms and public works projects undertaken by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933-1935 in response to the Great Depression in the United States.[3] The Green New Deal combines Roosevelt’s economic approach with modern ideas such as renewable energy and resource efficiency.[4][5]
A prominent 2019 attempt to get legislation passed for a Green New Deal was sponsored by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) during the 116th United States Congress, though it failed to advance in the Senate.[6] In the European Union, a 2019 proposal from the European commission for a European Green Deal was supported by the European Council, and in January 2020, by the European Parliament as well.[7]
In a 2012 essay I wrote for WND.com titled – The Shadow Power behind the Supreme Court regarding FDR’s Court Packing Plan, I wrote the following warning about how this judicial treason accomplished in 1937 in the so-called takeover of SCOTUS – “A Switch in Time Saves Nine” was due to mounting pressure by the burgeoning FDR administration and their Democrat Socialist allies to have his New Deal legislation made constitutional when two formerly “Conservative” Justices (Owen Stone and Charles Evans Hughes [Chief Justice 1913-41] the latter who infamously said, “The constitution is what the judges say it is”) suddenly flipped their votes in favor of FDR’s New Deal policies, and the rest as they say is history—
“FDR’s New Deal programs (1933-45) were an essential part on an overarching and existential progressive revolution purposely designed to affected and deconstruct all three branches of constitutional government – Legislative, Executive, Judiciary. Having achieved his first goal, flipping Justice Owen Stone to vote his New Deal policies constitutional, FDR, in a brilliantly Machiavellian move, quickly consolidated his extra-constitutional powers by using his highly placed “shadow justice” to introduce the idea of levels of judicial scrutiny. This way every present and future Supreme Court justice (irrespective of their ideology or philosophy) would unwittingly be forced to pay obeisance to FDR’s new progressive paradigm of judicial review, thus making his original intent to “pack the court” a fait accompli. . .”
Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance [ESG]
Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG), also known as environmental, social, governance,[1] is an approach to investing that recommends taking environmental issues, social issues and governance issues into account when deciding which companies to invest in.
Since 2020, there have been accelerating incentives from the United Nations (UN) to overlay ESG data with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), based on their work, which began in the 1980s.[2] The term ESG was popularly used first in a 2004 report titled “Who Cares Wins”, which was a joint initiative of financial institutions at the invitation of UN.[3] In less than 20 years, the ESG movement has grown from a corporate social responsibility initiative launched by the United Nations into a global phenomenon representing more than US$30 trillion in assets under management.[4] In the year 2019 alone, capital totaling US$17.67 billion flowed into ESG-linked products, an almost 525 percent increase from 2015, according to Morningstar, Inc.[5]
Critics claim ESG linked-products have not had and are unlikely to have the intended impact of raising the cost of capital for polluting firms,[6] and have accused the movement of greenwashing.[7]
Albeit the analysis of the major climate change and population control policies over the past 225 years is in synopsis form however, there are 3 MAJOR issues with all of the climate environmental policies are as follows:
First, it wrongly assumes a priori that the world is overpopulated, and that food, energy and natural resources are finite and will soon be used up. Second, since humans as carbon emitting meat bags are the problem (and no other living organism on the planet), humans must therefore be removed from the planet in order to “save the planet”. Thirdly, since time is of the essence and the scientific community is virtually 100% behind our policies, the world only has a few years left (Agenda 2030) to rectify the world’s overpopulation problem. To wit, if there are any dissenters, they are obstacles to progress whose opinions must be censored or silenced and if they continue to be “climate deniers” then we will treat them as we did Holocaust deniers at the end of World War II (1939-45). *N.B.: Everything about the Climate Change Policy and “Science” is all based on the Big Lie, Pseudo Science, Fearmongering and Propaganda with the ultimate effect of using Public Policy to establish a Satanic New World Order based on Socialism Slavery.
To some of my readers the above similar characteristics of climate policy by the Democrat Socialist Party is nothing but a restatement of Hegelian Dialectic – Satanic New World Order = (1) Create the PROBLEM, (2) Fund the REACTION, (3) Mandate the [Final] SOLUTION—
Therefore, once you purge your mind of all the propaganda taught by our corrupt institutions including the school systems (public and private), the colleges and universities, and even ancillary institutions regarding education including—law schools, graduate schools, medical schools, engineering schools, pharmaceutical industry, social media, politics, public policy, law, religion, philosophy. . . EVERYTHING they told you is all lies, propaganda and disinformation designed to force you into a perpetually evolving democidal or Hobson’s choices – a repetitive, ubiquitous tautology referred throughout history as Hegelian Dialectic—
D. Review Analysis of Stone Washington’s Article—Republican Working Group issues first critical report against ESG
After reading Stone’s very interesting and innovative article analyzing the pros and cons of ESG policy initiatives on the American economy I was impressed with the work by the Republican Party Working Group to shine the light of reason on this controversial policy initiatives of the Democrat Socialist Party.
Stone began his article with these words—
Last month, the Republican Environmental, Social, and Governance Working Group (ESG Group) unveiled an interim report outlining GOP efforts to combat the ideological subversion of U.S. financial institutions. The nine-member Working Group launched in February and is headed by Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-MI), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee’s Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee.
The ESG Group was largely formed as a rebuke to the regulatory overreach of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) attempt to mandate climate disclosures. The group sought to reestablish the traditional definition of “materiality” in order to counteract activist attempts to redefine material relevance to encompass non-financial environmental concerns. Additionally, the group sought to hold proxy advisory companies responsible for misusing the proxy process and asset firms for abusing their outsized influence when advancing ideological preferences through shareholder proposals. The group aims to prevent market participants from circumventing democratic lawmaking to impose corporate ESG policies on a company’s shareholders.
What stood out to me is the paragraphs above is how skillfully the Democrat Socialist Party has been here regarding the ESG debate but for the past 200 years this party has been in existence is to always try to seize the initiative of how terms are defined. The greater and more elastic terms are defined = the better chances of the Democrats are in controlling all arguments pro or against their initial policy objectives.
Thus, when Stone wrote, “The group sought to reestablish the traditional definition of ‘materiality’ in order to counteract activist attempts to redefine material relevance to encompass non-financial environmental concerns. Additionally, the group sought to hold proxy advisory companies responsible for misusing the proxy process and asset firms for abusing their outsized influence when advancing ideological preferences through shareholder proposals,” this language is directly in line with how the Democrat Socialist Party always seeks to define its terms on a sliding scale of meaning. Therefore, they are able to have plausible deniability if the Republicans, critics or even a judge questions the constitutionality of these policies.
Stone further wrote that,
This report focuses on the harms of ESG policies to everyday investors in America. Subsequent reports from this ESG Working Group will issue policy recommendations for intended reform. According to this report, the Republican group seeks to craft “a policy agenda designed to protect the financial interest of everyday investors from progressive activists who are using our institutions to force far-left ideology on Americans.” Public companies are encouraged to shift their primary focus away from pursuing non-financial political interests and back to expanding the value of their capital investments.
One of the primary targets of the SEC’s ESG agenda is a little known 2021 bulletin called the “Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14L (CF),” which created a streamlined process for activist shareholders to propose ESG-related ballots during the proxy voting season. Simultaneously, the bulletin made it more difficult for companies to prevent such measures from obtaining consideration, as the SEC pledged a greater focus on the social policy matters embedded in each proposal, rather than the company’s actual connection to the measure.
That action led to hundreds of ESG proposals from activist shareholders exploiting the new standard. The SEC permits any investor with at least a $2,000 ownership stake in a company to submit a proposal. A company is thus powerless to ignore a flood of suggestions, including those that were previously rejected. To counteract this, the Republican Work Group advises that the SEC raise the threshold for shareholders to present such proposals.
The crux of this entire article (at least from my perspective of history) is to use the U.S. Constitution as a weapon to chain the Democrat Socialist Party down from mischief as President Thomas Jefferson famously stated.
In other words, as Stone quoted in his article that the Republican group seeks to craft “a policy agenda designed to protect the financial interest of everyday investors from progressive activists who are using our institutions to force far-left ideology on Americans.” Stone finally states that,
The ESG Group concludes its report by covering several issues at play with the SEC’s ongoing attempts to integrate ESG requirements in its disclosure regime without congressional approval. The SEC’s pending climate disclosure rule is the most controversial of these initiatives, as it would radically alter the existing definition of materiality, while forcing many unwilling companies to become stewards of corporate sustainability. Second to this is the Commission’s plan to enact a human capital management disclosure, overhauling its previous principles-based approach. Currently, companies must disclose their human capital management policies and objectives only if they are deemed to be material. The new approach would force companies to issue specific data on their human management practices regardless of its value.
The Republican ESG Group’s interim report provides a good analysis of some of the most controversial elements of recent ESG policies. Concerned nonprofits and affected for-profit organizations should take advantage of these research findings to raise more awareness against ESG developments on Capitol Hill and petition those government actors responsible for adopting such measures.
Pressure should also be exerted against select asset managers and proxy advisory firms referenced in the report’s findings for operating in violation of established fiduciary responsibilities. This report represents a productive step toward advancing meaningful policy reform on ESG.
Nevertheless, Thomas Jefferson, a ubiquitous Framer of the Constitution, author of The Declaration of Independence and our third U.S. President warned that to keep tyrants at bay who would subvert the freedoms and liberties of the U.S. Constitution for their own benefits at the expense of We the People that, “In questions of power then, let it now more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” Historically and politically, this is the only way (apart from military takeover) that the tyrants of freedom can be prevented from destroying the Republic. In my opinion, ESG policy is simply the latest iteration by these tyrants of the Democrat Socialist Party to destroy the American Republic by using Socialist policy to enslave U.S. all.
E. 1776 the Year of Destiny—The U.S. Constitution stands as a bulwark against any ESG Policy, Statute or Law that seeks to deny any Fundamental Rights of the We the People or interfere with any Institutions including business that is based on Natural Rights and Natural Law
In conclusion, I came across the above instructive criticism on the demerits of ESG by Rep. Andrew Barr (R-KY). Here, I would like to divide his quotes into several sections followed by my analysis – First, Rep. Barr states that, “ESG is the greatest attack on capitalism, it’s the manifestation of stakeholder capitalism that is in the ecosystem today.” Remember Year 1776. That was the year America’s Founding Fathers collectively stated that they had had enough of British tyranny and abuse and rose up and crafted The Declaration of Independence.
1776 was also the year that the Scottish economist and philosopher, Adam Smith (1723-90) published his then radical statement supporting Capitalism called in its abridged form, The Wealth of Nations. Capitalism (and to a greater extent, Christianity) have historically been the bane of the Democrat Socialist Party’s objectives to deconstruct the U.S. Constitution, remove It’s God-given Bill of Rights which codifies our Natural Rights fomented under Natural Law, and to force all Americans to bow under the slavish tyranny of Socialism which is in reality Communism. May 1, 1776 was also the year that Adam Weishaupt establishes a Satanic secret society designed to subvert the freedoms and liberties of the world called ILLUMINATI.
When Rep. Barr further comments against ESG policy that, “It is harming and putting at great risk retail, mainstream investors” and that “When asset managers like Blackrock are selling to the retail investor community ESG, they’re making money at the expense of those retail investors. Those higher fees are cutting into returns,” he perhaps unwittingly swerved into the very reason why the Democrat Socialist Party has virtually since their inception in the 1820s to subvert the very principles of Natural Law and Natural Rights, Liberty and Freedom that our U.S. Constitution was founded on. Why? Because these God-given rights are anathema to the principles of Communism which are – Collectivism, Equality of misery, Anti-Family, and Anti-God.
As I wrote in a previous essay on Entrance Exam Criteria, the principles of the Illuminati are diametrically opposed to the Liberties and Freedom Jefferson enshrined in The Declaration of Independence. I wrote: “One more passage come after this quote—“That to Secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men.”
Thus, if the Court had written their opinion using a Natural Law and Natural Rights worldview (the original political and philosophical, legal and constitutional worldview first adopted by the Framers of the Constitution when writing all of America’s founding documents including—The Declaration of Independence (1776), the U.S. Constitution (1787) and the Bill of Rights (1789). In other words, if the Supreme Court had the vision and moral courage to obey their sacred CONSTITUTIONAL and JUDICIAL oaths that they all took before ascending to the High Court—
“I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States; and that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
Thus, either the three branches of constitutional government—Legislature, Executive, Judicial will dutifully obey the sacred oath to the U.S. Constitution that they all took, or they won’t follow this oath and thus open themselves up to ESG policy to kill capitalism and bread fraud, abuse and treachery, but they can’t do both!
*N.B.: In an 2015 essay titled – Magna Carta: 800 Years of Natural Law, I wrote the following passage explaining the historical necessity in American Jurisprudence to always delineate the law from a Natural Law and Natural Rights perspective—”One of my favorite definitions of Natural Law “Natural Law,” according to David Adams’ book, ‘Philosophical Problems in the Law,’ “contains principles and standards not simply made up by humans, but rather part of an objective moral order, present in the universe and accessible to human reason.”The Ancients like the Greek and Roman writers, frequently wrote of a “Higher Law” based on the laws of God that transcended the laws of Man and the laws of Emperors and Kings, and that bound them all.
Category: Commentary
