Symposium—Nietzsche, Feminism, 4B Movement and the Delusion that Gender Equality = Peace (in Society)

 

Socrates   Pythagoras Publius {Stone Washington, a precocious and devoted young student of Socrates and author of Socrates Corner}.                             Tertullian Ayn Rand (Objectivist Philosopher) Friedrich Nietzsche                       Napoleon Arthur Schopenhauer                       H.L. Mencken         Aristotle Abrose Bierce St. Paul    Black Men                                         Edward Abbey Thomas Edison Black Feminists (Jezebel Spirit)(Nihilism with hair extensions)  4B Movement (New Globalist, Extremist Feminism)(Jezebel Spirit on steroids) White Feminists (Jezebel Spirit)(Marxism with a dress)  W.C. Fields  Rupert Hughes

 

About the Author—Professor Ellis Washington, J.D.—I went to Harvard Law School for 1 year (1988-89) with future POTUS Barack Hussein Obama, (b. 1960 – d. 09/29/2019), who was a secret descendant of the Rothschild Banking Cartel Family and a blood grandson of the  German NAZI dictator, Adolf HITLER! who was also a Rothschild – but I took the opposite path in Life—New World Order, Communism, Treason, Pedophilia and Satanic Ritual Abuse vs. Christianity, Conservatism, Protecting the Children & TRUMPism. I repeatedly refused to take the “Satan OATH” which is why I’ve been blacklisted since 1989 – for over 35 years—for my entire legal and academic career, yet I Fight on! Why? To avenge Harvard University’s original 1692 motto—Veritas pro Christo et Ecclesia {= Truth for Christ and the Church}.  How do We the People escape the 150-year Rothschild Chattel Slavery systems (e.g., Birth certificates, Death certificates, Social Security numbers bought, sold and trading people’s identities like barnyard animals on Wall Street) and Rothschild Debt Slavery systems (e.g., IRS, Income Taxes, Death Taxes, Fiat or Counterfeit currency not based on Gold or Silver, but based on NOTHING!  Cui bono?– Who benefits? Why are all national currencies of the world promiscuously printed at will by the Rothschild Central Bankers? Is it to fund perpetual False Flag Wars while keeping the entire world enslaved inside an existential – Birth-School-Labor-Taxes-Debts-Retirement-Death cycle of the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia Matrix? (1871-2021) Further answers can be deduced by reading, studying and sharing the Truth of my Critical Thinking blog that is approaching 25 million views! @ EllisWashingtonReport.com and on Facebook, Twitter/X— #JesusIsGod (Isaiah 9:6) #DCActof1871

 

For unto us a child is born [= JESUS], unto us a son is given [= CHRIST]: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting  Father  [Jesus = GOD], The Prince of Peace. 

~ Isaiah 9:6 (740-680 B.C.)

He was in the world, the world was made by Him [Jesus], and the world knew Him not. He came onto His own [the Jews], and His own received him not. But as many as received Him, to them gave He the power to become the Sons of God, even to them that believe on His name.

~ John 1:10-12

Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

~ St. Paul, Colossians 2:8

 

Prologue—On Masculine vs. Feminine Natures and the Elusive Paradox of Peace between Men and Women though the Ages

 

Socrates: We are gathered here today at this Symposium to discuss what Theologian Paul Tillich called a Question of Ultimate Concern – Is it possible or even rational for a society to give Men and Women exactly the same Natural Rights when the Bible implies that Men and Women (although equal in the eyes of God) have two separate and distinct Natures? 

 

My Dear student, Publius, please declare to this august gathering at this Symposium what information have you found about this subject for today regarding the combative Natures of Men vs. Women?

 

Publius: Professor Socrates, before I give my preliminary report on opinions by the world’s great Philosophers from Antiquity to the present on the subject of Women and Women’s Nature, please allow me to include this addendum which is related to these dialectical questions you presented above?

Socrates: {intrigued} By all means, my dear Publius… Please proceed.

Publius: Professor Socrates, this question has vexed my Soul in recent times which provoked a query of which was posted on my social media [Facebook] . . .  

Why over the past week is my YouTube page being inundated with video after video after video of young, beautiful women all over the world, women in the prime of their life lamenting the fact that when they go out socially, that all MEN just ignore them?

It appears in 2024 that marriage-aged young Men have given up on dating because they are tired of being judged and refuse to play all of the silly, childish games Women make Men go through just to be in their company. Alone and frustrated, these Women for decade after decade after decade were blaming Men, slandering them as “Gay” or intimidated by “Strong”, “Independent” women. However, now in Year 2024, there is no one left to hear this insipid propaganda spewed from the mouths of these heretical Harpies. 

Therefore, Women have given up on blaming men, and have reached an epiphany. Women are slowly blaming themselves for why millions of them are alone in America (and throughout the world, see videos regarding growing epidemic of “leftover women” in China). After my initial deductive reasoning analysis, it seems to me Professor Socrates that Women’s Paradox of Peace against Men can be reduced to two major belief systems—(1) The Jezebel Spirit (= Witchcraft) that fomented the propaganda of (2) The FEMINIST movement for turning Men and Women into eternal Competitors and Warring Enemies, and now in modern times turning Men into Women and Women into Men.

Socrates: Good! Good! Good, Publius! Your reasoning abilities have certainly developed more since our last meeting (E.g., Symposium—Was the Black Boule Good for America?) Student Publius you are very close to deducing the answer to your own rhetorical question. The answer is closely related to my dialectical questions poised above and are centered around the ancient paradox of the Ages —Human Nature [NATURE] vs. Societal Norms [NURTURE] . . . Now, what information have you gleaned for the review of our first Philosopher, Nietzsche and his rather troubling and antagonistic views on Women and the Feminist movement?

 

Publius: Frederich Nietzsche (1844-1900) – Born 4 years before the so-called, “First Wave” Feminist or Women’s Movement was launched on July 19,1848 at the Seneca Falls Convention. Nietzsche was born in Germany (then called Prussia) just before the mid-nineteenth century where Germany and most of Europe would go through great societal upheavals, revolutions, counterrevolutions, profound cultural strife, and seemingly Perpetual Wars.

Socrates:  Was Philosopher Nietzsche right about the controlling, treacherous and duplicitous nature of Women that descended all the way back to Adam and Eve in  the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3),

or was he just a narrow-minded bigot and misogynist who hated women and because his lack of success in love, was intimidated by “Strong”, “Independent” women? For a point of reference, I refer this Symposium to listen to this short but insightful YouTube video titled – Nietzsche and Feminism: The Illusion of Equality.

 

 

Signers of the Declaration of Sentiments at the first Women’s 

Convention at Seneca Falls, New York (r.) in order: Lucretia Coffin Mott is on top of the list.

 

 

 

*N.B.: Former Black slave, autodidactic, abolitionist leader, speaker and Writer, Frederick Douglass was a signatory at the first Women’s Rights Conference and worked tirelessly with them for nearly a quarter century until frequent  and growing tensions about conflicting strategies between Women’s Rights vs. Black Rights came to a head in 1869 when the Women’s Rights leaders—Susan B. Anthony, Lucretia Mott, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucy Stone and others tried to force Douglass and the Black and White Men of the Abolitionist movement to push for White women getting the vote before Black men.

.

Historical IRONY on Voting Rights – A year later Black and White Men including Douglass successfully Passed the 15th Amendment (ratified March 30, 1870) granting Black men the right to vote. It wouldn’t be the last time White Feminists (majority of the Democrat Socialist Party) would betray the interests of Black Feminists … even to this day! For example White Women got the right to vote in the 19th Amendment (Aug. 18, 1920), but Black Women (in a de jure legal sense) did not get full and comprehensive voting rights until the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965!. . . nearly 100 years after the Black Man got the vote!

{cynical voice} Thanks White Feminist Movement for looking out for the most myopic, devoted and slavish voters of any racial group in American history – BLACK WOMEN – who to this day voted for the Democrat Socialist Party at 92-95%!! while White Women only voted 37% for the Democrat Party who enslaved Black Women for hundreds of years and forced and coerced you Black Women to have the highest ABORTION rates of any race of Women on planet earth!!

To understand this Judas-level of treachery, mass ignorance and Stockholm Syndrome writ large exhibited by Black Women for hundreds of years. “Strong” Black Women who stubbornly  remained on their Plantation enslaved to the Democrat Socialist Party… TO THIS DAY! See, Ellis Washington, Symposium—The When and the Why of Black Women’s Irresistible Impulse to Disrespect and Hate the Black Man? (2023)

Socrates: To demonstrate that this existential, historical, natural angst between the genders that existed nearly 20 years before at the earliest beginnings of the Abolitionist movement, in the article on the Seneca Falls Convention (July 1848) I found this interesting piece of history in the article regarding the first Women’s Convention that showed that even at the earliest beginnings of the Abolitionist movement White and Black men saw White women as being problematic in formulating sound tactics and strategies in abolishing the institution of Slavery in America—

.

Women in Abolition

According to Wiki, starting in 1832, Abolitionist and journalist William Lloyd Garrison organized anti-slavery associations which encouraged the full participation of women. Garrison’s ideas were not welcomed by a majority of other abolitionists, and those unwilling to include women split from him to form other abolitionist societies.

Socrates: [Paul Trejo] I think the most famous of all the anti-feminist philosophers was Friedrich Nietzsche. Yes, he loved his mother and his sister, and he asked Lou Andreas-Salomé to marry him (for only two years, not purely for love or romantic reasons, but so that he could get back into the higher-class social circles which had recently excluded him). Yet, recent philosophical thought and history speculates that Nietzsche was a closeted gay genius, yet very attached to the Patriarchy of his epoch —

 

–

Nietzsche: “From the beginning, nothing has been more alien, repugnant, and hostile to woman than truth—her great art is the lie, her highest concern is mere appearance and beauty.” (Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, [1886] para. 232).

Also,

Nietzsche: “Woman’s love involves injustice and blindness against everything that she does not love… Woman is not yet capable of friendship: women are still cats and birds. Or at best cows” (Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, On the Friend)

Also,

Nietzsche: “Woman! One-half of mankind is weak, typically sick, changeable, inconstant… she needs a religion of weakness that glorifies being weak, loving, and being humble as divine.” (The Will to Power, para. 864)

Also,

Nietzsche: “Woman has always conspired with the types of decadence, the priests, against the ‘powerful’, the ‘strong’, the men.” (The Will to Power, para. 864)

Publius: Professor Socrates, I think Nietzsche is the most famous philosopher of the 20th century, and perhaps still one of the most influential philosophers in the 21st century, so his anti-Feminism worldview may be the most famous (or infamous) depending on your beliefs about the verity of Feminism in the marketplace of ideas.

 

Socrates: Very good, Publius.  However, allow me to state this before we move on. Admittedly Nietzsche has rather blunt and unenlightened ideas about women which may come off to modern ears as unduly misogynist, cruel, or even psychologically delusional, but as with our first subject, Nietzsche, let us not take his statements as the Gospel truth, after all he was a member of the Patriarchy of his Age. But let us carefully examine his ideas about Women, Feminism and the ability for Men and Women to naturally truly get along given their conflicting Natures. 

For now, Let us leave Nietzsche and move to an earlier mentor of Nietzsche and many other philosophers throughout the world particularly in areas of German Romanticism and German Idealism, the Dutch-German Philosopher, Arthur SCHOPENHAUER (1788-1860) who possessed very blunt and uncensored ideas regarding Women many of which predated the “First Wave” Feminist Movement at the Seneca Falls Convention (1848) by several decades. 

My dear Publius, now tell this Symposium what general information have you gleaned regarding our second Philosopher Schopenhauer, and his views on the Nature of Women?

Publius: In my preliminary research and reading of Schopenhauer’s biography I discovered that he had a very combative relationship with his mother, Johanna (what Man hasn’t?) And he never married although he wanted to later in life. I also discovered that in order to satisfy (or pacify) his physical and emotional needs for human affection, Schopenhauer was thus content to live a life of fornication openly having sex outside of marriage – usually with women of lower social status, such as servants, actresses, and sometimes even paid prostitutes. (*See, Nietzsche and Feminism: The Illusion of Equality).

Arthur Schopenhauer spent two years as a merchant in honor of his dead father whom he greatly loved, admired and respected. During this time, he had doubts about being able to start a new life as a scholar.^[16]: 120 Most of his prior education was as a practical merchant and he had trouble learning Latin; a prerequisite for an academic career.^[16]: 117

His mother moved away, with her daughter Adele, to Weimar—then the centre of German literature—to enjoy social life among writers and artists. Arthur and his mother did not part on good terms. In one letter, she wrote:

“You are unbearable and burdensome, and very hard to live with; all your good qualities are overshadowed by your conceit, and made useless to the world simply because you cannot restrain your propensity to pick holes in other people.”^[19] 

His mother, Johanna, was generally described as vivacious and sociable.^[16]: 9 She died 24 years later. Some of Arthur’s negative opinions about women may be rooted in his troubled relationship with his mother.^[20]

Schopenhauer: “Women remain children all their lives, for they always see only what is near at hand, cling to the present, take the appearance of a thing for reality, and prefer trifling matters to the most important.”

Publius: {trying to lessen the tension in the air} Professor Schopenhauer, were you ever in love?

Schopenhauer: {reflective, emotive} Yes, just once. I was captivated by the beautiful Karoline Jagemann, mistress of Karl August, Grand Duke of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach, and I wrote to her my only love poem which I composed.^[16]: 135 Despite my later celebration of asceticism, free-love, and negative views of sexuality, I occasionally had sexual affairs—usually with women of lower social status, such as servants, actresses, and sometimes even paid prostitutes.^[16]: 21 

Publius: In a letter to his friend Anthime he claims that such affairs continued even in his mature age and admits that he had two out-of-wedlock daughters (born in 1819 and 1836), both of whom died in infancy.^[16]: 25 In their youthful correspondence Arthur and Anthime were somewhat boastful and competitive about their sexual exploits—but Schopenhauer seemed aware that women usually did not find him very charming or physically attractive, and his desires often remained unfulfilled.^[16]: 22

Socrates: In his 1851 essay “On Women”, Schopenhauer expressed opposition to what he called “Teutonico-Christian stupidity” of “reflexive, unexamined reverence for the female (abgeschmackten Weiberveneration)”.^[79] He wrote: “Women are directly fitted for acting as the nurses and teachers of our early childhood by the fact that they are themselves childish, frivolous and short-sighted.” He opined that women are deficient in artistic faculties and sense of justice, and expressed his opposition to monogamy.^[80] He claimed that “woman is by nature meant to obey”. 

Thus, in Schopenhauer’s famous writing, On Women, and in other works of his on related subjects like Love, Relationships, Courtship, etc… we see in these fascinating works of Schopenhauer that he believes that Men and Women have two very different, distinct and often polarizing Natures that are often in conflict and even at WAR one with another. And that this existential ‘War’ between the Natures of Women and Men has existed through the Ages.

White Feminists: {to Schopenhauer} Nevertheless, Schopenhauer you never felt the need to explain in your essay, On Women, why out of the millions of Women in Europe living at that time, that not one of them felt the slightest need to submit to or obey you despite all of your accolades from high Society?

White Feminists: {to Socrates} Furthermore, we don’t understand why must we be subjected to the opinions of Schopenhauer? A man who admitted himself had a lifelong contentious relationship with his mother, Johanna, “was the first German woman to publish books without a pseudonym, an influential literary salon host, and in the 1820s a popular author in Germany.” And Johanna may have even been a proto-feminist by today’s standards. Perhaps Schopenhauer was intimidated by his mother’s talents and thus remained antagonistic towards her all of her life. Socrates, really! Are Schopenhauer’s ideas about Women Progressive and Populist balanced and fair enough to not be a worthy victim of Cancel Culture today?

Socrates: {to Feminist Women} To your inquiry above, Feminist Women, why did you omit Veritas (Truth)? for this is the most important factor to consider when examining any person or their ideas on all things.

It should be noted at this Symposium that not all of Schopenhauer’s opinions about women were negative. Ironically Schopenhauer’s famous essay “On Woman” does give some compliments: “Women are decidedly more sober in their judgment than [men] are and are more sympathetic to the suffering of others.”

Furthermore, to the Feminist point above Schopenhauer’s writings influenced many, from Friedrich Nietzsche to nineteenth-century Feminists.^[81] His biological analysis of the difference between the sexes, and their separate roles in the struggle for survival and reproduction, anticipates some of the claims that were later ventured by sociobiologists and  evolutionary psychologists.^[82]

Publius: Socrates, once you opined that, “An unexamined life is not worth living”. What did you mean by that statement? 

Socrates: For example, that idea when applied to the life of Schopenhauer and his rather difficult and combative opinions he wrote about women reveal that the majority of his views about women weren’t reactionary, but rational, logical, even empirically based on the scientific method and on his own personal experience based on European societal norms of the late 1700s and early to mid-1800s. Moreover, his views on women didn’t seem to be ordered by reactionary bitterness, prejudice or misogyny. To Schopenhauer’s credit he seems to be an ‘Eternal Optimist’ (although a closeted one). Schopenhauer seems to always have a little light of hope in the Nature of Women to one day rise from their myopic, stereotypical estate to become a true benefit to Humanity, an unbreakable partnership with Mankind.

An example of Schopenhauer’s eternal optimism towards Women was when the elderly Schopenhauer sat for a sculpture portrait by the Prussian sculptor Elisabet Ney in 1859, he was much impressed by the young woman’s wit and independence, as well as by her skill as a visual artist.^[83] After his time with Ney, he told Richard Wagner’s friend Malwida von Meysenbug:

“I have not yet spoken my last word about women. I believe that if a woman succeeds in withdrawing from the mass, or rather raising herself above the mass, she grows ceaselessly and more than a man.”^[84]

Therefore, Schopenhauer didn’t remain in his paroxysm of misogyny as most Feminists would have you believe, but he evolved and when presented with the artistry and intelligence exhibited in his presence by Elisabet Ney who crafted this impressive bust of him pictured below, Schopenhauer’s prejudice against women found a worthy exception to his rule. Perhaps this was the idea Nietzsche had when he declared that,

 “The perfect woman is a higher type of human than the perfect man, and also something much more rare.” Which seems to be a variation of Aristotle’s view that “Women are imperfect Men.”

 

 

ß Bust of Schopenhauer on display in the Elisabet Ney Museum in Austin, Texas

 

Publius: Is that true in modern times of today the harsh words of your student Aristotle, Professor Socrates? Are exceptional women rare today because they are viewed through a feminist lens which is cloudy, cracked and thus distorts one’s view of her natural qualities?

 

Socrates: Indeed, my dear Publius. As long as society views women through the lens of men, rather than on their own merit with other women and in their own nature as women, then it appears that my pupil Aristotle was right that –

.

Publius: That, “Women are imperfect Men”?

Socrates: No. Aristotle is often attributed to this aphorism, “The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal,” meaning that treating people who are naturally different as if they are the same is the greatest injustice.

Nietzsche: “If a woman possesses manly virtues one should run from her; and if she does not possess them, she runs away from herself.”

 

“Woman has so much reason for shame”

 

    “Are you going to the woman? Don’t forget the whip!”*

 

White Feminists: How dare you, Nietzsche! to characterize woman needing a man to use a horse whip to keep Women in line, to keep women under subjection and under the authority of Men. This is SLAVERY! This is naked Misogyny writ large! You sound like Trump who the majority of Women just elected as our 47th POTUS which is why Feminist Women here in America have started the “4B Movement” = 

1. No Dating Men.
2. No Sex with Men.
3. No Marriage to Men.
4. No Child Birth with Men.
5. Socrates: {to Feminist Women} Yet, you omit that one important (yet embarrassing) new component of the 4B Movement is for Women to ‘de-beautify’ themselves by shaving their heads and thus destroying their  feminine beauty which is a gift from God implying separate and distinct Natures between Women and Men. *See, 1 Corinthians 11:14               

Socrates: You must understand that because of Feminist’s existential anger, hostility and wrath, qualities like subtly, demureness, coquettishness and farsightedness are all but lost in them. To wit, the historicism, metaphors and word play Nietzsche used in that witticism above seek only to deconstruct and destroy, never to elevate or enlighten.

*N.B.: Adolf Hitler used to walk around armed with a dog whip, though there is no record of him ever using it but for anything but its proper purpose. Knowing his weakness, his female admirers kept presenting him with such whips until he had an entire collection of him…

Socrates: Finally, regarding the newly emerging 4B Movement launched as a desperate rant by a generation of lost, men-less Harpies led by their fickle and capricious Nature and delusional emotions, here is a final irony about your so-called 4B Movement that I’m sure 99% of these women do not know about and when they learn this truth, will not compel them to repent and forsake these democidal delusions of Feminism, namely that, Anti-Trump’s Adoption of ‘4B Movement’ Hits Snag: Korean Origins Rooted in Trans & Homophobia.

Apparently, according to a 2019 Berkeley Political Review article, the 4B movement is associated with a term called “Womad,” a combination of the words “woman” and “nomad.” Womad is also a Korean version of Reddit specifically geared towards women. 

However, here’s the hilarious part as reported by the article:

“The term “Womad” is a portmanteau of “woman” and “nomad.” The website formed on January 22, 2016, after splitting away from a different online feminist community called Megalia. The reason for the split was Megalia’s ban on homophobic and transphobic slurs, which prompted some members to leave in search of a space to speak freely without having to account for LGBT rights. However, this is not to say that Megalia promotes equality; it too endorses hateful speech as a tactic to leverage women over men.”

Did you see it? That’s right. A large portion of the movement that’s sweeping feminists off their feet was, in part, created by transphobes and homophobes. Ironically, a Reddit thread also called out the movement for similar reasons.

Black Men: Socrates, historically our relationship with our Women, with the Black Woman has arguably been more contentious than that of White Men vs. White Women? Recall the first speech at a Women’s Conference in 1851 (just 3 years after the Seneca Falls Convention) by Abolitionist, Sojourner Truth. Rather than attacking the intrinsic evils of Slavery and challenging White society to live up to the ideals of the Constitutional Framers like Jefferson who wrote in the Declaration of Independence, “That all Men are created equal. . .”, Sojourner felt compelled to put on her proto-Feminist hat on taking umbrage and attacked Black Men, ironically most of whom at that time in 1851 were powerless, existing still in the bondage of Slavery themselves! Yet, Black Women so-called leaders were pitiless regarding our servitude plight which most Black Women shared in the 1600s, 1700s and most of the 1800s in American history!

Black Woman Abolitionist, Sojourner Truth (1797-1883)

Truth was speaker who delivered a famous speech titled, “Ain’t I a Woman?” at the 1851 Woman’s Rights Convention in Akron, Ohio. In this speech, she discussed how she was just as strong and capable as any man. 

Socrates: Why do you believe that Black Women, even in the boundaries of Slavery with Men, nevertheless felt the need to compete against the Black Men rather than taking the tactical and strategic advantage of viewing Black Men as natural and allies (not competitors) in their yearning to be Free in America?

Black Men: The same reasons why White Women feel the need to leave the safety and security of home, half-kill themselves getting college and even advanced degrees to move up the corporate ladder in the workplace, working day and night to show that  (like Sojourner Truth above) “that they are just as good as Men”, have few to no children, only to find themselves in the words of relationship expert and YouTuber, Kevin Samuels (1969-2022), that they are mired in futility, trapped in their ‘golden years’ and on the verge of dying alone with 4 or 5 cats? And Women incredulously wonder why many Men (of all races and cultures) find these type of Feminist Women increasingly insufferable and repugnant to Humanity. The remedy to eradicate the hateful, unequal philosophy of Feminism from the marketplace of ideas is by cancelling all Feminists and publically silencing their heretical Harpy voices on a global scale.

Furthermore, Professor Socrates, because of the 3-head dog, Cerebus – ‘the hound of Hades including– White racism, White Privilege and White Supremacy much of Black history was viewed through the jaded lens of Slavery, Ignorance and Infamy. Thus Black Men were viewed by their own Black Women as not being strong enough, smart enough, resourceful enough to protect the Black Women from our mutual oppressors which since the 1400s was not only the White Man, but the Arabs and Muslims and before both of them warring Black tribes in Africa. Each of these groups frequently enslaved other Black tribes and traded their fellow Blacks to the White and Muslim slave traders for centuries until the Whites and Muslim slave traders removed the Black African middlemen so to speak, yet today these Slave perpetrators throughout History are all but ignored by the Modern Black Women. Why? Do they not know their own History of Slavery and Servitude throughout the Ages… even to this DAY?!?

See, Thomas SowellTV – Why Blacks Owned so many Slaves in the Americas? It is time to expose the literal whitewashing of History into neat black/white, up/down, good/bad paradigms. Real History, True History is much more nuanced, dynamic and interesting than the White Man = Eternal Victimizers, Black Man = Eternal Victims we’ve all been taught in our propaganda public schools, private schools, charter schools, colleges and universities.

Secondly, as Professor Washington stated in his recent comprehensive essay exposing the Judas-level treachery of the Black Woman against the Black Man from the earliest beginnings of Slavery to this day. Washington wrote the following in his Feb. 2024 essay titled, Symposium—The When and the Why of Black Women’s Irresistible Impulse to Disrespect and Hate the Black Man?—

*N.B.: The Slavery System in America was also financed and bankrolled by White Men of Secret Societies, particularly the Illuminati, Freemasons, Rothschilds and Rockefellers, unscrupulous millionaire financiers and industrialist called, “Robber Barons” would soon after the end of slavery (in 1865), in 1871 invented a new type of Economic Slavery called Chattel Slavery and Debt Slavery which exists in all nations of the world to this day.

But here is the Judas Treachery of Black Women who failed to understand the complex duplicity of the Women’s Rights movement. White Women told Black Women who wanted to join the Feminist movement (while ignoring the Abolitionist movement of Frederick Douglass) to get away from your Black men, don’t listen to your Black Men, forsake your Black family and join US to get your “Equal Rights”… in the FUTURE! While we go home every night to our White Husbands and make dinner for our White Families which remain intact, while you, Black Women, neglect and undermine your own Black Family. . . for What?!?

 

*N.B.: Scene from the 1939 movie classic, Gone with the Wind, depicting the Civil War and its aftermath. Here, Mammy (played by Hattie McDaniel, who went on to become the first African American to win an Academy Award), is aggressively clearing a path for her “Mistress”, Scarlett O’Hara to walk through the crowded streets in Atlanta: “Out of our way, trash! Get out of the way here. Get away! Go on!”

Also, this scene above exposes the utter contempt, hatred and disrespect displayed by the Black women servant-class had towards their own Black brothers, some of whom (as in the movie scene above) were Black soldiers presently fighting in the Civil War—heroic and courageous Black men risking their lives fighting for Mammy’s (and all Black Women’s) right to be free in America! Yet, Mammy only saw these Black men as “Trash”?!? *N.B.: See, House Slave  vs. Field Slave  Paradox and Malcolm X describes the difference between the “House Negro” and the “Field Negro”, Michigan State University speech, 23 Jan. 1963.

Black Men: Yes, Professor Washington is citing unspeakable History here that most women (especially the Black Woman) because of Cognitive Dissonance (e.g., the stress and psychopathy from holding conflicting views in the mind, i.e., Black Women’s love/hate relationship with Black Men) will be unable to accept which only proves the points by Nietzsche and Schopenhauer of the infantile or childish nature of Women. Professor Socrates, recently we came across two interesting and profound commentaries about Women, the second one of which will perhaps unlock centuries of why Black Men and Black Women can’t get along. The first one was titled – The woman’s story (beg. @0:47) which were found particularly revelatory.  

The second one I think a Glorilla meme which should give Black Men in America a profound pause of why Black Men and Black Women don’t get along, WON’T get along, and in 2024 it seems to be getting WORSE by the day! 2 Words to meditate on… PEACE and RESPECT (e.g., Honor, Submission). 

Black Men: GloRilla’s impromptu declaration made me have an epiphany. . . It’s that word, ‘PEACE’. That’s what Black Women have for centuries denied the Black Man. A secondary construct to Peace would be ‘Respect’. Modern Black Women refuse to give their Black Men Peace, but especially   R-E-S-P-E-C-T.

Publius: But WHY, Black America won’t Black Women submit to their Black Men for the sake of societal Peace?

Black America: Black Women won’t give Black Men Peace because they have no peace within themselves. And they furthermore have (more than the White Women) bought into the Jezebel Spirit of Perpetual War, Disrespect and doing as she pleases, whenever she pleases in all things, and the Black Man is just suppose to shut up and accept and bankroll her foolishness with the holy sacrament of Marriage?. . . Those Beta-Male delusional days are over! 

Black Feminists: You Black Men just can’t handle and Strong, Independent Black Women. . . Blah-Blah-Blah-Blah! 

Black Men:  We now understand that after 400+ years of Slavery institutionalizing in all aspects of society and culture – White Supremacy, White Privilege and nearly 200 years of MK Ultra Mind control of the White Women’s Feminist Movement and the Socialism Slavery of the Democrat Party all which Black Women have been allied with TO THIS DAY! that most Black Women will never see the irony above in the picture of Glorilla shilling for her Democrat Party masters at the Kamala Harris event.

What do we mean?  Look at the “Freedom” signs in the background. Here’s the message: Black Women until you come under the authority of Jesus Christ and under the authority of your Black Men you will  never get Liberty and Freedom, Peace and Security from the Democrat Socialist Party… The Party of the KKK and Slavery, but you will remain lost and Enslaved generation, after  generation after generation until you humble yourself, confess your sins, repent and get SAVED!

Socrates: Publius, regarding Relationships and Sexuality did Nietzsche ever marry?

Publius: According to my research Nietzsche was never married. He proposed to Lou Salomé three times and each time was rejected.^[119] One theory blames Salomé’s view on sexuality as one of the reasons for her alienation from Nietzsche. As articulated in her 1898 novella Fenitschka, Salomé viewed the idea of sexual intercourse as prohibitive and marriage as a violation, with some suggesting that they indicated sexual repression and neurosis.^[120] Reflecting on unrequited love, Nietzsche considered that “indispensable … to the lover is his unrequited love, which he would at no price relinquish for a state of indifference”.^[iv]

Other scholars have argued that Köhler’s sexuality-based interpretation is not helpful in understanding Nietzsche’s philosophy.^[127][128] However, there are also those who stress that, if Nietzsche preferred men—with this preference constituting his psycho-sexual make-up—but could not admit his desires to himself, it meant he acted in conflict with his philosophy.^[129]

Epilogue—Feminism and the Illusion of Equality

Socrates: Here is an Addendum of varying Philosophical views (in no particular order) from different Philosophers through the Ages about marriage, relationships and the Nature of Women . . .

Pythagoras: There is a good principle which created order, light, and man, and an evil principle which created chaos, darkness, and woman. 

Aristotle: The male is by nature superior, and the female inferior; and the one rules and the other is ruled; this principle of necessity is extended to all mankind. 

St. Paul: Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.         ~ Paul [I Corinthians 14:34-35]

For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. ~ Paul [I Corinthians 11:8-9]

Tertullian: It is not permitted for a woman to speak in the church, nor is it permitted for her to teach, nor to baptize, nor to offer [the eucharist], nor to claim for herself a share in any masculine function– not to mention any priestly office.

Tertullian: Bow your heads to your husbands [submission] – and that will be ornament enough for you. Keep your hands busy with spinning and stay at home – and you will be more pleasing than if you were adorned in gold. 

Martin Luther: A woman has no control over herself. 

Napoleon Bonaparte: Nature intended women to be our slaves. They are our property. 

Friedrich Nietzsche: When a woman becomes a scholar there is usually something wrong with her sexual organs. 

Thomas Edison: Direct thought is not an attribute of femininity. In this, women are now centuries behind man. 

The natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex evidently unfits it for many of the occupations of civil life….The paramount destiny and mission of women are to fulfill the noble and benign office of wife and mother. This is the law of the Creator. 

~ Supreme Court, 1873 (Upholding an Illinois law which prohibited women from becoming attorneys)

Rupert Hughes: Women’s intuition is the result of millions of years of not thinking. 

W.C. Fields Women are like elephants. Everyone likes to look at them, but no-one likes to have to keep one. 

H.L. Mencken: Love is the delusion that one woman differs from another. 

Edward Abbey: In everything but brains and brawn, women are vastly superior to men. 

Ambrose Bierce: Woman: A creature whom a man can’t get along with or without. Animal usually living in the vicinity of man and having a rudimentary susceptibility to domestication. 

St. Paul: Colossians 2:8 = Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

 

In the book of Romans, Jesus commanded that I expose the idolatry, pederasty and the Jezebel Spirit that was rampant throughout the Greco-Roman Empires. These are the words the Holy Ghost inspired me to write in Romans 1:25-26—

26For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Socrates: Could the Apostle Paul be writing about a first century women modelling proto-Feminism? See, 2 Timothy 3:4-6:

…4traitorous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, 5having a form of godliness but denying  its power. Turn away from such as these! 6They are the kind who worm their way into households and captivate vulnerable women who are weighed down with sins and led astray by various passions…

Addendum—The Phony Construct of Feminism by Objectivist Philosopher Ayn Rand

Socrates: Let us end this Symposium with the founder of Objectivist Philosophy, Ayn Rand (1905-82). This was Ayn Rand’s answer to a question asked after her 1978 lecture on The State of American Culture. Question: Why are you opposed to the Feminist movement?

Ayn Rand: I am profoundly anti-Feminist, to begin with. I have not mentioned them… {loud applause}. Thank you. I have not mentioned them [Feminists] today because they did not happen to be included in any of my talks here at this Forum, but I’ve written about the Feminist movement in my magazine, The Objectivist.

I am profoundly opposed to [the Feminist movement] because it is a phony movement. To begin with, it’s Marxist-Leftist in origin. You say it’s exploiting the Black movement; it’s exploiting everybody. It wants its cake and [to eat] it, too. It wants “independence” for women― government funded independence with a gun behind them. Independence, supported by taxes. Extorted from whom? From men, whose equals they claim to be.

But men did not get established in this country with the help of the government. Not in this country [America]. And if women want to be equal―and of course, potentially they are―then they should achieve it on their own, and not as a vicious, parasitical pressure group which is what they are!” {thunderous applause from the audience}

Ayn Rand: “You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.”

Socrates: Let us here the conclusion of this Symposium on Nietzsche, Schopenhauer and the Democidal Delusions that Gender Equality = Peace in Society. If this Symposium has taught you anything its that Gender Equality ≠ Peace in American Society (or anywhere else), but quite the opposite―Angst, Chaos and Inequality, Obsession, Repression and Psychopathy.

The late German Romanticism period (c. 1850-1900) could be summarized by that great German Composer, Johannes Brahms‘ defining aphorism of his Age―Frei, aber einsam (Free, but lonely), because he chose not to marry his beloved Clara Schumann. (For a more historical treatment of the legendary and Platonic relationship between Brahms and Clara Schuman, See—I Remember Chiarina Green My High School Friend (2021).

Publius: Why did Brahms forsake his true Love, Clara?

Socrates: So that his genius as a composer could mature and grow, develop and blossom without the burdens of daily family concerns (which by adopting Clara’s 8 children would entail!) – thus History has vindicated Brahms and Clara’s choice to remain Platonic because Brahms is one of the greatest composers from the School of German Romanticism.

Thus, I would characterize a motto for today’s Gen Z women and their Feminist precursor generations going back to the Baby Boomers who are embracing the slavish and Nihilism of the 4B Movement with this ignominious motto―Frei, aber versklavt = Free, but enslaved.

Therefore, the ubiquitous Jezebel Spirit of Modern times is manifested in CIA MK Ultra mind controlled people in society slavishly believing in the phony, perverted and democidal screeds of Feminism – not for true gender equality, but as the de facto and cowardly consequences of avoiding the Reality of VERITAS (Truth)!

 

 

 

Tags: black people, civil-rights, featured, feminine mystique, feminist, marriage, socrates, symposium

Category: Commentary