Riots vs. Republic—Unhinged Traitor Chief Justice John Roberts Rants against Natural Law

About the Author—Professor Ellis Washington, J.D.—I went to Harvard Law School with future POTUS Barack Hussein Obama for 1 year (1988-89), but I took the opposite path in Life—New World Order, Communism, Treason, Pedophilia & Satanic Ritual Abuse vs. Christianity, Conservatism, Protecting the Children & TRUMPism. I repeatedly refused to take the “Satan OATH” which is why I’ve been blacklisted for 30+ years—for my entire legal and academic career, yet I Fight on! Why?—For Harvard’s original 1692 motto—Veritas pro Christo et Ecclesia {= Truth for Christ and the Church}. To escape the 150-Year Rothschild Chattel Slavery systems (e.g., Birth certificates, Social Security numbers bought, sold & traded on Wall Street) & Rothschild Debt Slavery systems (e.g., IRS, Income Taxes, fiat/counterfeit currency based on NOTHING, printed to fund false flag wars) of the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia Matrix (1871-2021), read and share the Truth of my Critical Thinking blog with the Youth that’s nearing 20 Million views @ EllisWashingtonReport.com & on Facebook — #JesusIsLord #DCActof1871

Lex iniusta non est lex – An unjust law is no law at all.

~ Saint Augustine (354 – 430 AD)

A new untruth is better than an old truth.

~ Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes (1926)

Prologue to the Forgotten Keys of Civilization & Law

On Dec. 18 vlogger Dr. Steve Turley did an interesting show which in part covered some basic history on the long-forgotten intellectual, legal and political philosophy that once governed the essential foundations of the U.S. Constitution called Natural Law and Natural Rights. Dr. Turley’s video was initially about the alleged meltdown of Chief Justice John Roberts during the SCOTUS meetings on whether they would grant Certiorari to the big election fraud case brought by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton who recently filed an emergency appeal to SOCTUS against contested swing states – Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Even though, this landmark case would eventually be joined by 25 other states and about 126 members of Congress, as President Trump would always say regarding the 3+ year Trump/Russia collusion hoax against him – “the fix was in”. Now evidence has surfaced that none other than “conservative” Chief Justice John Roberts, a 2005 SCOTUS nominee of ‘Republican’ President George W. Bush, sabotaged the Texas election fraud case on a fixable technicality of Standing, refused to bring this case before SCOTUS, and thus (in his mind) paving the way for a Biden/Harris presidency on Jan. 20, 2021? I think not!

Below is a transcript of the conversations that allegedly went on during that fiery SCOTUS meeting which indirectly brought up some interesting issues about what types of judicial philosophies do members of SCOTUS use in order to arrive at a proper, just and constitutional decision. Also, questions arose whether or not is “Justice” and the “Rule of Law” left to other Machiavellian legal philosophies and conventions? – ‘The end justifies the means’; ‘Might makes right‘; ‘Survival of the fittest’, ‘Natural Selection’; ‘Will to Power‘, ‘Do what thou wilt’, ‘The Economics of Justice‘, etc.

However, history tells us that in the American colonies from our earliest times, Natural Law and Natural Rights were always used as the foundations of government formation, law and governance. For example, in the early 1600s when the Puritans and Pilgrims arrived in North America from Europe, they set up colonial governments based on the English and European model of Natural Law and Natural Rights. Why? To protect the people’s inalienable, God-given rights which were explicitly derived from God and thus were beyond the reach of any man-made laws or secular laws.

Natural Law philosophy was also expressly enshrined in America’s first Constitution called the Mayflower Compact (Nov. 21, 1620), and later America’s Founding Fathers and Constitutional Framers of the 18th century originally used Natural Law and Natural Rights to form all of the State Constitutions (including the original 13 colonies up to the admission of the state of Nebraska [1875]), proceeding to the Declaration of Independence (1776), Articles of Confederation (1781), U.S. Constitution (1787), and the Bill of Rights (1791). In fact, all of America’s founding governing documents were originally Natural Law and Natural Rights in conception, scope, and application until the 1870s. This begs the question – Qui bono – Who benefits? Who removed Natural Law and Natural Rights from the U.S. Constitution and jurisprudence. . . and WHY?!? The answers below will expose all of America’s traitors then during colonial times up until now at the end of Year 2020 . . . the 400th anniversary of the Mayflower Compact.

“Natural Law consists of principles and standards not simply made up by humans, but rather part of an objective moral order, present in the universe and accessible to human reason.” ~ David Adams, Philosophical Problems in the Law (1992)

However, it seems by the text below that Machiavelli not Montesquieu shapes and dominates Chief Justice John Roberts’ worldview because in the SCOTUS meeting excerpt in the article below the only “Rule of Law” Chief Justice Roberts deems worthy of his consideration is Nietzsche’s Willen zur macht (Will to Power) or Democracy which = MOBOCRACY = the Rule of the Mob. In other words, Roberts’ sole consideration of whether to grant the Texas election fraud case certiorari was not his pretext of “Standing”, but his irrational (and judicially irrelevant) fear of mass rioting all over the nation if Trump became president again, and the overarching imperative for Chief Justice Roberts to form an ironclad SCOTUS majority to rule against President Trump serving another 4-year term as president by any means necessary! America, Chief Justice John Roberts’ actions here if true amounts to T-R-E-A-S-O-N!

Here is the Dec. 12, 2020 article by Hal Turner published in the Uber-Leftist publication, Nation which includes the transcript from the SCOTUS meeting containing the unhinged, anti-Natural Law rant by Chief Justice John Roberts –

Dr. Steve Turley on Natural Law & Natural Rights

Returning to Dr. Steve Turley’s vlog on Chief Justice John Roberts rant against Natural Law – in gratitude I sent him some of my materials on Natural Law and Natural Rights.  Below is a transcript I did regarding the portion of Dr. Steve Turley’s vlog that addressed the history, policy, and philosophical importance of Natural Law and Naturals Rights to the creation and preservation of the American Republic—

DR. STEVE TURLEY [beg. @8:12]: “So legal scholars have detailed how judicial philosophy has radically changed over the last century… For example, here in the United States the Founding Fathers were all proponents of what’s called Natural Law and the Natural Law tradition. That’s a very important term to know, Natural Law and very simply here Human Law is not invented, it’s more discovered because Human Law is supposed to reflect transcendent Divine Law as it is revealed in nature and human reason. And the assumption here is that the world around us is filled with a divine meaning and purpose. There is a transcendent telos – “Nature and Nature’s God” – a divinely ordained integrity to the world. That human reason not only can discern but is actually obligated to discern in the ordering of human, moral and legal structure. That’s what governed jurisprudence for basically 2500 years in the Western tradition.” “But in the 19th century, as knowledge was more and more redefined solely around Scientific Rationalism, Natural Law assumptions began to collapse, and that’s because science had supposedly revealed that there is no divine meaning or purpose to the world it’s simply made up of biological chemical and physical causal laws. And so, in the place of Natural Law you saw the emergence of what is in fact its antithesis and that’s what we call Legal Positivism. Legal Positivism argue that all legal norms are mere human fabrications, they don’t reflect a transcendent obligation inherent in the created natural order but are rather the invention of populations.”   “So Legal Positivists assume a radical nature, culture, and dichotomy that would have been totally alien to our Founding Fathers, but that’s the default legal position of the vast majority of our judiciary today. They are emphatically not an objective independent branch of government, they are virtually all servants of Legal Positivism and who in turn actually believe it’s their job not to interpret the law, but to actually construct the law in accordance with their own modern understanding of the world.”   “And so, we need to come to terms with here – I mean frankly the scary thing to all of this is that Natural Law theory there is a distinction between Law and Justice in that while a society’s laws can change our standard for justice never does. That’s because Justice is a cosmic principle of eternal order and economy that serves to order and organize societies.” “The societies can change but the standards by which they change do not. That means that there’s a basis for citizens to contest unjust laws. A law is unjust when it’s our moral duty to disobey it. But with Positivist Law justice and law are consolidated since there’s no transcendent standard of justice in the created order, just cause and effect processes.”   “And so, what this means is that our very conceptions of justice are just as malleable; just as changeable as our laws, and since Positive Law derives its legitimacy from the State, there is no basis for a citizen to contest the justice of the law beyond the decrees of the State. So, what I would argue that Positive Law is inherently tyrannical by nature. And that my friends is what we need to be keeping our eyes on. It’s not so much whether Roberts is morally compromised or anything like that – we’ll of course see if that’s the case.” “To me it’s more the fact that the legal system itself of which Roberts is a practitioner and definer the legal system itself has been radically liberalized [perverted] and needs to return to the Natural Law tradition in order to restore a truly Conservative legal standard in our society. Now the good news is that’s precisely what we are seeing today. We are seeing what’s called the rise of post-Secular Law all over the place, but it’s going to take a lot of work and a lot of patience to see post-secular law return to the Natural Law tradition at the highest levels of our courts – that is going to be our really goal our real goal here.” [End]

[Facebook post] Dr. Steve: Love your show and link it to my Facebook page every day. Your 12/18/20 show exposing the duplicity and treachery of Chief Justice John Roberts and your eloquent analysis of Natural Law was a Godsend and well done. I am one of the few Black Natural Law scholars on the planet and have been like John the Baptist – “a voice howling in the wilderness” – for over 40 years! Hope you like my definitive and comprehensive statement on Natural Law titled, “REPLY TO JUDGE RICHARD A. POSNER ON THE INSEPERABILITY OF LAW AND MORALITY” [Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion, 1999].

Later in 2002, I expanded this law review article into a book titled – The Inseparability of Law and Morality. Please feel free to post on your blog and send to everyone. . . especially our Youth who must learn the TRUTH!

*N.B.: Here is another law review article I wrote in 2017 on that Liberal champion of Positive Law, Legal Positivism, Eugenics Racism, and Evolution Atheism – Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes titled – 1918-2018: 100 Years of UnNatural Law of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. 

How Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes & the Democrat Socialist Party helped Destroy Natural Law and Natural Rights in American Jurisprudence and Society

NATURAL LAW & NATURAL RIGHTS was the political and policy, intellectual and legal foundation for the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, the Supreme Court (and all U.S. Courts), and the political and philosophical, intellectual and legal foundations of Western Civilization for over 2,500 years going back to the legendary Greek Philosophical Trinity of Socrates – Plato – Aristotle – Yet, Natural Law philosophy dates even further back in human history than the ancient Greek philosophers to the Old Testament Biblical era where it was sometimes called, “Higher Law” by certain legal scholars like Edward S. Corwin, Lon L. Fuller and Justice Clarence Thomas.

The book cover above is my definitive, comprehensive history of Natural Law and Natural Rights traditions in U.S. Constitutional law, politics and history which I wrote in 2002 explaining and exposing how since the late 1700s the New World Order’s lust for power, opportunism and championing the death of Natural Law and Natural Rights through the late 19th century Trojan Horse of Scientific Rationalism, the Socialist/Communist Left enshrined the anti-intellectual treachery of men like August Comte, Hegel, Darwin, Th. Huxley, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, Weber, Justice Holmes, Justice Brennan, Richard Dawkins, and hundreds of other evil men legitimacy into the Academy and places of honor in key institutions in society.

Since the early 1800s these deceitful men knew they were spewing lies created and exploited by the pseudo-science propaganda of Darwin’s Evolution Atheism, his cousin Francis Galton’s Eugenics Racism, Holmes’ Legal Positivism, J.S. Mill’s Utilitarianism, Liberalism and Progressivism, Dawkin’s Scientific Rationalism, and yes even ‘Civil Rights’ laws of the 1960s as secular counterfeit philosophies of the Biblical Natural Law and Natural Rights, yet they continued to teach these Big Lies to generation after generation after general of naïve students in college who then slavishly make careers out of propagating eve the Big Lie – That mankind can separate Legality and Morality and arrive at Justice.

In other words, virtually everything they taught you in elementary, middle school, high school, college, graduate school and Law School about History and Politics, Law, Philosophy and Science are ALL LIES!!! The definitive quote below by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes exposes the purposeful lies evil men lodged against Natural Law and Natural Rights to open the door to Utilitarianism, Communism, Socialism, Liberalism, Fascism, Nazism, Progressivism, since advent of the French Revolution (1789-99) —

Epilogue: Riots vs. Republic – Positive Law vs. Natural Law – Satan vs. God

The definitive quote below by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes exposes the purposeful lies evil men, secret societies like Freemasons, Rosicrucians, the illuminati, and Globalist banking cartels like the Rothschilds for example have deconstructed nations and cynically funded both sides of every major war since America’s founding (July 4, 1776). Also, the Satanic institution of the Illuminati founded by Jesuit-trained Adam Weishaupt 2 months before America’s founding (May 1, 1776 aka the origins of “May Day” celebrations in Communist countries around the world to this day). Finally, the Satanic Globalists first successful attempt at establishing a New World Order globally led to the apotheosis of Liberal Fascism called – The French Revolution (1789-99).

In the picture cited above there are what I consider the 3 infamous Anti-Constitutionalist Judges of American History and their terms on SCOTUS— Chief Justice Robert Taney (SCOTUS: 1836-64), who wrote the infamous opinion in the pro-Slavery case, Dred Scot v. Sandford (1857), the case that literally lit the fuse 4 years later in 1861 igniting America into a genocidal Civil War (1861-65) causing over 1.5 million deaths. In his unconstitutional arrogance Taney in the Dred Scott case wrote the quintessential Positive Law or Legal Positivism statement – “The negro has no rights that the white man is bound to respect.”  Oliver Wendell Holmes (SCOTUS: 1902-32), in his 1926 letter to his close friend, the English intellectual and Socialist, Harold Laski, wrote his own equally venomous, anti-Natural Law aphorism—A new untruth is better than an old truth. For over 100 years this evil aphorism has been used by Liberal, anti-Constitutionalist judges at all levels of the judiciary to both kill Natural Law, Natural Rights while concurrently enshrining the most debauched, perverted and illegal acts upon society not through the lawmaking power entrusted by the Constitution to Congress, but by an oligarchy majority of lawless Justices on the Supreme Court!

Finally, Chief Justice John Roberts (SCOTUS: 2005 – present) treacherously upheld (twice) the blatantly unconstitutional power grab of forcing all Americans into a Communist universal healthcare system that violates all principles of Natural Law and Natural Rights. For example, Wikipedia has the following entry of the case in question—“National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court upheld Congress’ power to enact most provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly called Obamacare, and Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA), including a requirement for most Americans to pay a penalty for forgoing health insurance by 2014.”

Philosopher George Santayana famously warned society and the world that —”Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.” What does that mean in the historical context of Natural Law vs. Positive [Eugenics] Law? As dictators have always destroyed nations, institutions and society down through the Ages, people and institutions like—the Roman Catholic Church (and their Popes), the English & European Monarchy, Marx, Otto von Bismarck, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Pol Pot, the Iranian Mullahs, Saddam Hussein, and all of the Communist and Fascist dictators down through history knew this absolute fact—He who controls a Nation’s healthcare controls [enslaves] the Masses. How? Once We the People accept the Faustian/Satanic bargain of Communist healthcare, you have given the State your collective Soul through submission of your Body. Thus the State now has the godlike power over the life and death over the masses, over those who must now bow down and obey the fascist dictates of the State or like in Nazi Germany in the 1930s the Healthcare Gestapo will be unleashed to kill the People.

Exhibit A: Covid-19 fake Pandemic Hysteria = Positive Law/Eugenics Pretext to World Economic Deconstruction, World Enslavement, and eventually World Genocide under the Satanic, Illuminati New World Order which since June 20, 1782 their motto is engraved on the U.S. Great Seal and since 1935 printed on the back of every U.S. $1.00 bill –  Novus ordo seclorum = “New order for the Ages” or New World Order.

CIA MK-Ultra Mind Control 2020 – Thanks to the Globalist Gestapo and Deep State establishment politicians, scientists, courts, the Academy, Communist Big Media, the Covid-19 fake pandemic hysteria in 9 months has caused America and the world to abandon Natural Law and Natural Rights principles in a Faustian exchange for the economic democide of purposely allowing protegee’s of the 1945-60 Operation Paperclip, whereby experts possessing a racist, eugenics Nazi worldview in medical, business, legal, geopolitical, economics, education, psychology, sociology, and other fields since the end of World War II have been strategically allowed to immigrate to America, placed in control of all key societal institutions. Why? To systematically kill our economy, turn our homes into Concentration Camps, pervert our laws by propagating a militant Nazi eugenics worldview designed to eventually destroy billions of people and their businesses worldwide not through Covid-19 (which I stated early is a pretext), but through the fallout of succumbing to the lies of a fake Covid-19 pandemic hysteria which 99.999% will never die from—aka the common flu or common cold. Adolph Hitler would have never loss World War II if he had only wore a white medical lab coat.

Remember the #1 precept of Natural Law and Natural Rights – We the People are under no legal or moral obligation to follow or obey any unjust laws, but are commanded by Natural Rights to rise up and wage eternal war against all enemies of Natural Law and Natural Rights.

Tags: featured, Martin Luther King, Natural Law, natural rights, U.S. Supreme Court

Category: Commentary